More than half the people living in Inner regional (61%), Outer regional (56%) and Remote and very remote areas (55%) had completed Year 12, compared with three-quarters (79%) of those in Major cities (ABS 2022b). In 2022, people aged 20–64 living in rural and remote areas were less likely than those in Major cities to have completed Year 12 or a non-school qualification (Figure b). Unadjusted (crude) rates are available in the supplementary data tables, and are often available in the referenced and/or linked reports. ![]() As the purpose of this web report is to make comparisons between remoteness areas, age-standardised results have been used for health risk factors and chronic conditions, where possible. Age-standardised rates are often used to compare outcomes for populations with different age structures, such as remoteness areas. This means that comparisons between population groups can be confounded by differences in their age distributions. Health status, outcomes and service use are associated with age. Figure 1: Australian population, by age groups, sex and areas of remoteness, 2021 You may also view the Data Table by selecting its tab. Figure 1 shows the age and sex breakdown of each of the remoteness areas for 2021.įigure 1 can be customised by selecting from the ‘Remoteness Area’ drop-down menu. For Inner regional areas, 21.5% of the population were age 65 years or older in 2021 compared with 15.4% in Major cities and 12.5% in Remote or Very remote areas (ABS 2022e). On average, people living in Inner Regional and Outer regional areas are older than those in Major cities. First Nations Australians have lower life expectancies, higher burden of disease, poorer self-reported health and a higher likelihood of being hospitalised than non-Indigenous Australians (AIHW 2022a AIHW and NIAA 2020, 2021). However, the proportion of the total First Nations population increases with remoteness from 1.8% in Major cities, to 32% in Remote and very remote areas based on estimated Indigenous population projections for 2021 (AIHW 2021c). As at 30 June 2021, the proportion of Australians by area of remoteness was:Īboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (First Nations) people are more likely to live in urban and regional areas compared with more remote areas. The majority of Australians live in Major cities compared with rural and remote areas. This report uses the MMM for presentation of access to primary health care and health workforce data. The MMM was developed to better target health workforce programs and to attract health professionals to more remote and smaller communities. It classifies metropolitan, regional, rural and remote areas in Australia into seven categories:Īreas classified MM 2 to MM 7 are considered to be rural or remote. The Modified Monash Model (MMM) (Department of Health and Aged Care 2021) is based on the ASGS Remoteness Structure and also town size. Due to small population sizes, data for Outer regional and remote and Remote and very remote areas are sometimes combined for reporting. This report uses the term ‘rural and remote’ to cover any area outside of Australia’s Major cities. These remoteness areas are centred on the Accessibility/ Remoteness Index of Australia, which is based on the road distances people have to travel for services (ABS 2021b). The Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS) Remoteness Structure, 2016 (ABS 2021b) defines remoteness areas in 5 classes of relative remoteness: Individuals, teams, entire workforces, can perform well while being entirely distributed-and they have.This report uses 2 remoteness structure classification systems. ![]() We learned that a great many of us don’t in fact need to be colocated with colleagues on-site to do our jobs. Personal technology and digital connectivity had advanced so far and so fast that people had begun to ask, “Do we really need to be together, in an office, to do our work?” We got our answer during the pandemic lockdowns. ![]() The experiences of GitLab, Tata Consultancy Services, Zapier, and others show how the risks associated with this type of work can be overcome.īefore 2020 a movement was brewing within knowledge-work organizations. The ResearchĪs more companies adopt work-from-anywhere policies, best practices are emerging. But when all or most employees are remote, challenges arise for communication, knowledge sharing, socialization, performance evaluation, security, and more. Studies show that working from home yields numerous benefits for both individuals and their organizations, most notably in the form of enhanced productivity and engagement. Will this mark a long-term shift into all-remote work? Benefits and Challenges The Covid-19 lockdowns proved that it is not only possible but perhaps preferable for knowledge workers to do their jobs from anywhere.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |